Give it up, even the guy in the article itself said 'this is an educated guess AT BEST'.
Guess you missed that part. Twice.
That's proof right there that I'm not out to lunch.
We could have had a nice conversation or debate had you not resorted to name calling in your very first post. But your insistence that I don't understand this and am being baseless and ignorant is not only untrue, but filled with venom and vitriol for some weird reason.
If the guy himself says it's a educated guess at best, how is me saying I think it's a wild claim ignorant? Hmmm? Last I checked educated guesses weren't considered proof (or even a plausible theory) and people that don't agree with them aren't ignorant.
Like I said, science is supposed to be about disproving things. Just because you can't (as you said it might be out the the realm of our technology) doesn't mean you can suddenly make claims about it.
You're using the same logic that the god crowd does. You can't NOT prove 'He' doesn't exist.
Give it a rest. Whether you're the resident astrophysicist or not, you've forgotten one of the most basic tenants of science.
You had no right to take up to that notch. And are completely incorrect in doing so.
Like I said disagree if you want, but there is nothing wrong with my understand or line of thinking.
You have your belief and you want to belief in it, fine, but you're coming off like the people who believe someone is listening to their prayers. You have no proof, and only conjecture.
EDIT: I'll stop now if the mods want, I was posting before that suggestion came through
|