Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon+Jun 14 2005, 04:03 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Agamemnon @ Jun 14 2005, 04:03 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by CaramonLS@Jun 14 2005, 03:59 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon@Jun 14 2005, 03:57 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-CaramonLS
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
@Jun 14 2005, 03:49 AM
Aga, no offense - you are a complete nut job.
This has nothing to do with Gays at all. Try reading what someone posted as opposed to chalking it up to the "big conservative conspiricy" world you live in.
|
Lol, no offense? Ah the name-calling, first-refuge of the nimble of mind. 
I'd respond... but you added nothing to the debate. I'm reading each post here quite carefully. What is this 'big conservative conspiracy' you speak of? I'm very interested... Are you a part of it?
|
If you actually read Clarkey's post before spouting off on him, this issue really had nothing to do with Gays at all.
|
So, Clarkey is actually upset at all public displays of nudity and sexuality? Of promiscuity? Homosexuality seriously as _nothing_ to do with this?
Seriously? You believe that?
If that's the case, then I'll gladly concede the point. However, I'm pretty convinced that this topic was started with an undertone of anti-homosexuality. Hmm... probably because it was brought up completely within the context of the GAY PRIDE PARADE.
I mean, it's not like other examples have been brought up, have they? Please. [/b][/quote]
I'll let Clarkey field that one, but that is what I got out of it. That and his point about stereotypes.
I don't think Clarkey is anti-homosexual at all.