Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
I don't know if this has been mentioned or not, but...
They separated in 1998. That's 10 years ago, when the kids were 6 years old. It's not like he's been raising these kids in a big happy family all this time. She had the twins, they got divorced 6 years later, she put him on the hook for palimony and he's been paying it ever since. While she had full custody and all he had was visitation rights.
Now, all of a sudden, she wants to cut his visitation rights and increase the amount of money he's paying... so he got a DNA test to confirm the kids were his. They're not his kids, and they never were his kids. Since they were divorced 10 years ago, and now have evidence that they were never his kids to begin with... he should not be responsible for the payments.
|
Exactly, she wants to cut him out of their life and get more money from him, but when he says you want me out of your life then fine I want completely out, the courts say no.
So it is OK for the mother to cut the father out but not OK for the father to leave? WTF?