Quote:
Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan
Well, her actions are deplorable to be sure.
Still, he was their father in the house for 6 years. If they divorced and said F it, he isn't any better.
|
I'm certainly more sympathetic to the male in this case. He wasn't their father, he was more of an ATM for the mother.
He paid in good faith it sounds like, she tried to take advantage of the situation. As soon as the lack of paternity was establish especially after 10 years of divorce, his obligation should be over.
I agree that the courts should have the ability to impose penalties and restitution on the woman and the real father who should have been paying the whole time.
Sure its right for the children, but the situation is certainly not right for the victim.