Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
Prove it. I don't buy that at all.
You might find some evidence that male and female judges side with women litigants.
|
In these situations, the man always seems to be guilty until proven innocent. And it seems the most atrocious decisions are made by female judges. I suppose perception becomes reality in the case of my argument.
Of course, the problem with the rights of the kids always coming first, which I don't disagree with, is the implied argument is that the woman is unable to raise her kids without his support. If she actually cares about her children at all, she'd do just that if necessary.
But, I stand by my original argument. He's raised the kids for 16 years, let him pay for them for two more. Then give him the right to go after the mother for every single penny he was robbed of. Once the kids are adults, they live their own lives, and the
victim can then go after the criminal for compensation.