Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy89
Then mention that as why and not the fact that there was two victims. I understand the spirit of the judgement, but Captain's issue was going after the underlying moral question legal or not of whether the child's rights should another 'innocent' party?
I'm sure I know where you'll justify that arguement on moral grounds. . . but I'd like to hear it anyway.
|
What about a woman with kids whose husband dies? Can the courts make a stranger pay some expenses? That would be in the best intrests of the kids?
Ok that may be a little extreme, but how about saddling a close family friend with child support? What if he is really close to the kids? You hear people saying all the time..." Mr. Johnson was like a father to me when I was growing up" Legally it seems if its in the best interest of the kids, he could be paying child support?
Bullspit