Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I think the law is wrong in this case. He didn't suspect his wife was a dirty ho, and had no reason to question their paternity.
|
In the judgment it said that the "dad" had in fact suspected his wife of infidelity. He didn't make an issue of support payments and the paternity of the twins until there was an application to restrict his access to them.
Other than the facts (which aren't that shocking or outrageous as far as Family Law goes), there isn't a lot to set this apart from other decisions. Best interests of the child FTW.
Full decision here:
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc...nlii68884.html