Quote:
Originally posted by Hanna Sniper+May 30 2005, 03:19 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Hanna Sniper @ May 30 2005, 03:19 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-flambers@May 30 2005, 05:59 PM
I agree, history shows the team with the bye to the Final usually wins.# It would of been a better game if there was a day between games.
|
It could also be because the better team earned the bye in the first place. And in most cases beating the other team in the round robin also. While i understand what you're side of the coin is saying and I don't totally disagree with it, but I don't think that it would have changed the outcome of the game. It's an excuss and nothing more in my eye's [/b][/quote]
Yah, I do agree London is a great team but remember London earned the first place with an OT goal. I still believe the format does not work. The team going into the final has a huge advantage. London still probably would of won but the game would of been competitive.