As well, if a gun isn't the weapon of choice, it all but eliminates a third party getting caught in the crossfire or mayham.
As for his stats on handgun bans, well I don't know too much about those specific studies, but the studies were still done in the states where there is still easy access to guns. A ban that lasts a few years or is only in a few states is not going to make a difference anyway. You just go across state lines.
You look at first world countries that have bans or stricter rules, and the homicide rate is proportionally lower. The accidental death rate is also lower. I'm not sure how one can argue with that.
Yeah it kinda sucks for a large amount of well meaning people to lose a right because some people can't be responsible, but in this case, it might be worth it. There is no NEED for a handgun. Sure some people might like them, but they don't NEED them.
|