Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagal4321
What she said. The ball may have crossed the plane when he caught it(still don't think so), but not when he had posession of it, by rule.
But regardless that's too close to call, which would not make it inconclusive evidence to make them change the call on the field.
I wonder how long it will be until the refs are held accountable for botching calls that decide games.
|
I'm not sure they ever will, or at least not in the case of 98% of the calls. They are human and they make mistakes when they need to make calls at full speed.
Now in this case I think the call falls into the other 2%, and I can't see how this was "indisputable visual evidence".
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|