Quote:
Originally posted by Shawnski@May 21 2005, 01:29 AM
And your singular point, reply, or whatever it is, is like most debates within Question Period in the House of Commons; it is STILL "Nihil ad rem".
|
How so? Seriously, tell me in detail why my original posts had no point. I used words that had double meanings to point out how ridiculous it was to use them and then claim it means something else. You can't just say that someone has no point and then not make a case. That is a big cop out. You might as well not even respond at all.
Quote:
|
Grow some testicles and admit your "point" is moot. And I would be interested in the response to the changing of meaning of the word "marriage" as currently proposed by the Liberals vis-a-vis, your lack of respect to the "sensitivity to the historical meaning" of words.....
|
Again, you are totally changing the subject and it just shows that you have no legs to stand on in this conversation. I'm not talking about preserving definitions of words. I'm talking about sexist remarks. It has nothing to do with the definition of the words not changing. What in God's green Earth does the definition of marriage have to do with calling someone a whore or a slut? You say that I have no point yet you can't even stay on topic for more than 3 consecutive posts.
Quote:
|
So these derogatory words should not change to reflect both genders instead of just women. We should respect the sensitivity of a word of the "historical meaning" to "oppressed" groups only.
|
So what now? You're going to single handedly change the word so that it reflects both genders equally? Whether you like it or not, the word is a lot stronger and more mean spirited when it is applied to a female. You can't change that just by ssaying that you don't like it.
Quote:
|
Kinda sounds similar to the NHLPA only wanting "upward linkage".
|
WTF!? Seriously, you will have explain that connection.
Quote:
|
FA, I have made myself clear in my combination of words, their context, and their meaning. If you have another word, or combination of words that I should have used to describe the political prostitution that Stonauch committed, I would be pleased to be enlighteded
|
The only thing you have made clear is that you are sexist and have no tact or respect for women.