Quote:
Originally Posted by Jade
A) It was not specifically partisan. Sure his party was in the best shape, but you don't have to be a conservative to think that parties should have to raise money themselves. This was put in because the corrupt Liberal government that was in at the time needed money and felt entitled to taxpayer dollars ( I mean really, they stole enough around that time frame too).
|
Right. This was non-partisan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jade
B) That footnote not is not currently in the mini budget. It was taken out. The conservatives made all the amendments the liberals indicated (to the media not the conservatives, because why try to make this work), and yet it changed NOTHING. Why? Maybe because they weren't the issue in the first place. They were an excuse. The liberals wanted power, this was what they used to get it.
|
I've said about 50 million times in this thread, and the last, but I guess I'll need to say it again,
I don't like this coalition plan. All I'm saying is that I can understand why they're doing it. They have no reason to believe that the Conservatives aren't going to try this nonsense throughout their leadership and they've had enough. I've had enough of this partisanship too. I would be ok with McKay as leader of the Conservatives though.