Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
Ah, the appeal to personal incredulity. I know how to interpret that.
The difference is that the evidence contradicts what you are saying. Apparently your definition of "close consultation" is not the same as mine. But really--is this so important? What's at stake in elevating Harper to a higher ground than anybody else? Why not just admit that Harper did what he himself said he did in a letter to the GG?
|
Feigning political outrage at a simple fiscal update while conducting back-room deals with two fringe parties 6 weeks after an election during a time of economic crisis is the same?