View Single Post
Old 11-28-2008, 11:31 AM   #240
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyBeers View Post


Well the ability to form a stable coalition government is something that I guess only you can determine. It seems to me that if the government falls over the lack of stimulus provided to the economy by a party that has pissed away a 13 billion dollar surplus, the GG has an obligation to see if these left of centre parties could form a coalition government before going to the polls.

It seems to me that very few people seem to understand the reality that the governing party needs the confidence of the House to govern. That is how our system of government works, the government is not the party that wins the most seats on election night, it is the party that has the confidence of the House. If the Tories lose that confidence by providing an inadequate fiscal update, or by not properly cleaning up election financing by eliminating 10 percenters, riding subsidies, tax credits for political donations, or for whatever reason the Loyal Opposition deems is appropriate, then they lose the confidence of the House, plain and simple. The GG then has an obligation to see if there is another party that can gain the confidence of the House. It is not like we do not have a precedent in Canada for this exact type of thing happening before....
You do know what a government surplus is... right? Overtaxation. So we should be happy that the Conservative government gave us enough money BACK so that they now have to struggle with balancing the books instead of manufacturing surpluses through taxation. That's how a government makes its money.

They've only been constrained by the stupid attitude in Canada that it is not okay to roll back the size of our massive government. They should continue cutting the fat off of our already bloated government programs.
peter12 is offline