Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop
I think the issue is (from the Ottawa Citizen report) that the motion with the objectionable wording was passed by council. Now there's back-tracking, with the result being the motion will be re-worded.
As such, the wording was, by association, endorsed by many in the passing of the motion.
Classic example of group-think without thinking.
|
Isn't it ironic that this occured in Ottawa of all places...
