Quote:
Originally posted by Snakeeye+May 14 2005, 03:15 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Snakeeye @ May 14 2005, 03:15 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by FlamesAddiction@May 13 2005, 04:35 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Snakeeye
|
Quote:
@May 13 2005, 11:05 PM
As for working with Duceppe, I don't get the devil from Quebec argument. So long as Quebec remains a Canadian province, the BQ are their representatives in parliament. In this case, the two parties have a common cause. I really find working with the Bloq to bring down the Liberals to be far less reprehensible than the NDP working with a corrupt party outright demanding billions of dollors be wasted for that support.
|
So you wouldn't at all wonder if it were the Liberals or NDP making behind the scenes politcal alliances with the Bloc?
|
The Liberals have been making deals with Quebec for decades. Why is it such a scandal if the Conservatives do? Like I said, I find Layton's "unholy alliance" to be far more reprehensible, especially since he simply came out and told the world how much of a bribe he would require to throw his support behind a corrupt party. [/b][/quote]
You missed the point. The Liberals and the Bloc have common ground on many issues, economic and social. They can make several deals that don't have to play on separatism.
What possible deal could the Bloc and Reform party make that are not related to dismantling the country?