Quote:
Originally posted by Hakan@May 14 2005, 10:15 AM
Sorry but I just don't see what's so 'reprehensible' about democratic deal making and collaboration. You have a blind hate-on for Layton which is completely uncorroborated by the facts of the situation. Layton has been acknowledged by almost every major poll as the leader who is doing the best job in this whole mess. Why can't you acknowledge that? If you do answer could you refrain from using straw man arguments such as "he's a socialist/communist" or arguments that he doesn't have a democratic mandate to do what he's doing because he clearly does.
|
So then there is nothing reprehensible about the Tories and Bloq teaming up to bring down Martin then, right?
Personally, I have no problem with Layton as a person. Politically, I disagree with virtually everything he stands for, and judging by the polls, an overwhelming majority of Canadians also disagree with him. He can be the nicest guy in the world, but that doesnt change the fact that his ideals stand to destroy this country. As such, it becomes alarming when the NDP and it's 19 MPs take over government. Layton's willingness to work with a corrupt government is more reprehensible than Harper teaming with Quebec's MP's to bring down the government. You can only invent more boogeymen and conspiracy theories to try and slander the CPC for working with the Bloq. PM Layton came right out and demanded a $5 billion bribe for his support.