Quote:
Originally posted by Snakeeye+May 14 2005, 08:15 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Snakeeye @ May 14 2005, 08:15 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by FlamesAddiction@May 13 2005, 04:35 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Snakeeye
|
Quote:
@May 13 2005, 11:05 PM
As for working with Duceppe, I don't get the devil from Quebec argument. So long as Quebec remains a Canadian province, the BQ are their representatives in parliament. In this case, the two parties have a common cause. I really find working with the Bloq to bring down the Liberals to be far less reprehensible than the NDP working with a corrupt party outright demanding billions of dollors be wasted for that support.
|
So you wouldn't at all wonder if it were the Liberals or NDP making behind the scenes politcal alliances with the Bloc?
|
The Liberals have been making deals with Quebec for decades. Why is it such a scandal if the Conservatives do? Like I said, I find Layton's "unholy alliance" to be far more reprehensible, especially since he simply came out and told the world how much of a bribe he would require to throw his support behind a corrupt party. [/b][/quote]
Sorry but I just don't see what's so 'reprehensible' about democratic deal making and collaboration. You have a blind hate-on for Layton which is completely uncorroborated by the facts of the situation. Layton has been acknowledged by almost every major poll as the leader who is doing the best job in this whole mess. Why can't you acknowledge that? If you do answer could you refrain from using straw man arguments such as "he's a socialist/communist" or arguments that he doesn't have a democratic mandate to do what he's doing because he clearly does.