Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
The court found the contract "unfair" for several reasons, but the one I want to focus on is the fact that the husband had not disclosed in advance the value of his assets.
I don't think the Supreme Court is nullifying pre-nups - they will be nullified in unfair circumstances, and this article only describes one of them from the case.
The husband's net worth was at least $10 M.
|
There may have been some other circumstances that actually made the agreement unfair. Unfortunately, the article didn't list them so I don't know what they were. This particular one, in my opinion, doesn't seem unfair.
Could you shed any light on how not disclosing your net worth would be deemed unfair from a legal perspective?
edit: i see you've posted some trial details while I saw typing. Thanks.