I think it's pretty standard since the article is wrapped around the person he's intereviewed.
The premise of the article is the discovery of issues with Kyoto based on findings from Canadian scientists.
Could have have followed up with the other side? Sure, but how often do we see that kind of balance in any articles for or against any issue these days?
My overall point stands, in my mind, if it's POSSIBLE that there issues. Stop, pull Canada out of it and have a good hard look. I can flush the contents of my wallet down the toilet without Ottawa, I don't need any help.
|