Quote:
Originally posted by Flames89+May 12 2005, 01:17 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Flames89 @ May 12 2005, 01:17 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mike F@May 12 2005, 03:54 PM
From that I'd say that the questions about Mann's work don't blow up the support for climate change the way the article implies.
|
That is what I was trying to say.
This journalist, who is obviously anti-Kyoto, is using the one study's lack of verification to discount the whole global warming theory all together. [/b][/quote]
I think one assume's the writer is anti-Kyoto because he's saying something you may not want to hear.
As a stand alone it certainly holds water as a news story in my mind. And even more so given the Canadian roots to some of the scientists. The hockey stick graph from Mann is certainly the center point of a lot of Kyoto talk, regardless of how many sources they actually have.
If that data is wrong, it's certainly worth looking at, don't you think?