Quote:
Originally posted by Looger+May 11 2005, 11:33 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Looger @ May 11 2005, 11:33 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon@May 11 2005, 10:41 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Looger
|
Quote:
@May 11 2005, 10:35 PM
being against kyoto seems to make people think you're anti-environment
|
Where there's smoke, there's fire.
I think the biggest issue pro-Kyoto advocates would point out is that the anti-Kyoto crowd doesn't seem to have a better solution. Doing nothing is generally frowned upon as a 'solution' to human impact on the planet.
If the anti-Kyoto crowd wants to defeat Kyoto AND not look like environment-bashing cash-grubbers, they need to come up with their own comprehensive solution. Are anti-Kyoto people honestly surprised that they're condemned as anti-environment? They're great at pointing out the problems, but I don't see many solutions.
Don't we all love the person who's great at pointing out the problem, but doesn't put forward their own idea? I know I do.
|
fair enough.
have goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
here's the kicker:
NON_TRANSFERRABLE CREDIT!
without this, it's as broken as the last cba. [/b][/quote]
Sounds good. Stamp it with a cool name, get all the anti-Kyoto folks on board, and maybe I'll come along.
Until that day... I'll be on the side of Kyoto, because, in the end, I believe it will do more good than damage. I feel like we are definitely destroying this planet, and the lack of alternative solutions is apalling. Until they exist in a comprehensive format, there's no other Protocol for me to support.