Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
Same response. Very poor reading at what he was getting at. Very poor.
|
Ha! The classic HOZ response of "I am the only one that can extract meaning from my links but I won't bother explaining what I think they mean to people. Instead I'll just make a drive by."
As for the article you linked to. Meh. His whole premise is that because he thinks there is no science behind climate science therefore it is a religion. He can call it a pseudoscience if he wants to, but calling it a religion is still wrong. I stand by what I said earlier. All that other filler about SETI and science having a consensus and being wrong is meaningless. Because science had a consensus and was wrong in the past doesn't mean it's wrong now. Other fields of science have a consensus and he doesn't seem to have a problem with them.