View Single Post
Old 05-09-2005, 03:05 PM   #12
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by CaramonLS+May 9 2005, 08:57 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (CaramonLS @ May 9 2005, 08:57 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-RougeUnderoos@May 9 2005, 08:37 PM
Allow free votes by MPs on moral issues

Subtle. What moral issues are they interested in dredging up to satisfy certain portions of their electorate. I wonder....

As for the rest of it...

Missile Defense Yes! Kyoto No! War on Drugs Yes! Vague International Security Threat Yes! Cut Taxes Yes! 4 Year Elections Yes! Tighten Immigration Yes! Gay Marriage No!

It all seems oddly familiar. Why is that?
I don't see anything wrong with this.

Theres no hiding behind "party lines" for how you vote on these issues. [/b][/quote]
Well that idea scares me. Is my MP going to vote his/her conscience or is that person actually going to represent their constituency?

At least if they are towing the "party line" then I can feel safe voting for the party that has a platform that follow my beliefs.

The statement sounds like a cop-out to me. Moral issues are too contentious so the Conservatives don't want to take a stand on them. And yet they claim to support the traditional definition of marriage. That seems like a bit of a contradiction to me.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote