Quote:
Originally posted by Bend it like Bourgeois+May 3 2005, 05:27 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Bend it like Bourgeois @ May 3 2005, 05:27 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Agamemnon@May 3 2005, 10:22 AM
Well, since you've gone ahead and re-stated your reasons for separation (or disenchantment, or whatever) along the lines of 'its my oil, i'm keeping all of it', I don't have much choice but to revert to simple greed statements.# 'Labours' is not a euphamism for 'oil'.# A government without waste is utopian thinking.# Get used to it, it happens everywhere, all the time, and when they get caught, its time for a change in parties.
|
From that you get 'it's my oil, I'm keeping all of it'?
Keep up the good work kid. [/b][/quote]
Well, you claimed that your biggest beef was with your 33% of your 'labours' going to Ottawa, apparently to be mismanaged.
And thats why you sympathise w/ separation? The Gun Control fiasco? Ad Scam?
Oil doesn't even enter the equation for you?
So what _are_ your reasons? Don't want to pay taxes?
I guess I made the mistake of thinking you actually had a semi-legit reason for taking this position beyond petty issues.