View Single Post
Old 10-22-2008, 04:15 PM   #4
RedHot25
Franchise Player
 
RedHot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Probably stuck driving someone somewhere
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy89 View Post
I think your answer to the question of why there's so much opposition to Friedman is right there. It's not like it's the economists from the University of Chicago that are ones opposed to this, it's falculty from others diciplines who know jack s&*t about eocnomics (Ie the Naomi Klien Crowd) that are against this.

http://www.friedmanfacts.com/
So one must be "trained" in economics to have an opinion on this? Or am I misunderstanding you. If that is in fact what you are alluding to, then, for example, no one who doesn't work in law enforcement should have an opinion on crime; only those who work in/studies homelessness should have an opinion; etc. I prefer to look at economics (or any subject matter) from a holistic perspective; so these objectors (whether right or wrong in their opinion) should have the chance to, well, object.
RedHot25 is offline   Reply With Quote