[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by ken0042

Now, that being said, while I think dogs owners should be responsible, I also think the OP has a point with there not being signage, and he also has a point to raise for city council regarding land use for dog owners.

See that's the part that I found to be the most rediculous.

Why would the city put up signs everywhere that dogs need to be on a leash when the bylaw is that they have to be on a leas everywhere except designated areas. Which one is simpler/easier?

If I get a ticket for peeing in public would I have a point that there were no signs that said I couldn't pee there?