[Bend it like Bourgeois]

Originally Posted by Ronald Pagan

Nobody's saying it is.

Show me some science that refutes the theory that humans are changing the climate and then we can debate it.

Trust me, I would like nothing more than for some credible findings to emerge that we are having no effects on the climate. Scientists are trying to do this every time they test the anthropogenic climate change theory.

That seems weird.

So if scientists were actively trying to disprove the idea that a sasquatch exists, but as yet could not, would that mean a sasquatch must exist?

I don't think it works that way.