yeah, i see what you are saying. but really its just semantics. its attacking his words instead of his idea in order to make him look unreliable. personally i agree that most scientists would stray away from the 100% quote because most scientists realize that things can change and that absolutes are few and far between. but, IMO i think ronald was just trying to convey that in the scientific community there is no doubt that humans are causing these problems. yet no one has been able to argue that either a)scientists are NOT in agreement that man is causing climate change or b)climate change is being caused by other factors. instead, all we get are people tearing down ronald for stating his opinion in not the smartest way. its why internet discussion are rarely worthwhile; people can't discuss the issues.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
This individual is not affluent and more of a member of that shrinking middle class. It is likely the individual does not have a high paying job, is limited on benefits, and has to make due with those benefits provided by employer.
|
|