i love how you guys all like to jump on ronald, but not provide a counter argument of your own.
you fault the guy for using the 100% statistic, but i would be willing to bet that had he used any other number this would have happened:
ronald: its 99% sure that humans are causing climate change
dumb poster: yeah well then that means there is still a 1% chance its something else. lets all drive suvs around because humans can do whatever they want and not suffer any consequences
sorry for my over the topness, but we've all been through this type of discussion before... one side presents data, logic, and reasoning. the other presents insults, innuendo, straw man arguments, and lots of other fun stuff!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
This individual is not affluent and more of a member of that shrinking middle class. It is likely the individual does not have a high paying job, is limited on benefits, and has to make due with those benefits provided by employer.
|
|