[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by Sowa

The bear vs. human example doesn't work because obviously it's firstly a huge if statement. You admit it's full of holes so that's good, but its akin to saying I shot my wife because tomorrow she might get eaten by a bear.

I don't think capability determines morality. For instance, the United States has evolved into the world's most powerful country. Should the US be able to do what it wishes for instance take over Canada? In fact if the majority of people made the decision to stop eating meat would we not eventual evolve into a species that is complete herbivorous?


That's a very good question. Some as I stated above grant it to those with cognitive abilities. Some apply it to those who feel pain (which in itself is a grey area). I guess you find a philosophy that fits you.

So what is your philosophy then? Where do you draw the line.

Are you a vegan?
Do you eat chicken of fish?
If you are only against the beef industry do you have a problem with me killing and eating a deer or moose?