Quote:
Originally posted by home_sweet_dome+Aug 20 2004, 12:55 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (home_sweet_dome @ Aug 20 2004, 12:55 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Cowperson@Aug 19 2004, 04:40 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...-2004Jun26.html
From the story:
[i] An annex to the country's interim constitution requires the approval of a majority of Allawi's ministers, as well as the interim president and two vice presidents, to overturn any of Bremer's edicts. A senior U.S. official in Iraq noted recently that it would "not be easy to reverse" the orders.
|
Thanks for the article Cow. It basically says the exact same stuff as the article I posted, so thanks for helping me out.
Of course with the approval of so many people, especially US influenced people, needed to overturn Bremer's edicts, they ain't gonna be overturned anytime soon, thus allowing America to continue to control Iraq, just as my original article stated.
So, um, thanks again I guess. Now the "real news stories" and the "crap I was peddling earlier" both seem to support my original point. [/b][/quote]
Thanks for giving up.
We both know the LA Times letter you posted had zero way out for Iraqi's, had no depth because that would have destroyed the author's position and did not present an alternate view for the reader.
Aside from that . . . . it was still a piece of crap.
Cowperson