Quote:
Originally posted by Mike F+Apr 20 2005, 11:52 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mike F @ Apr 20 2005, 11:52 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-MarchHare@Apr 20 2005, 10:13 PM
Quote:
But of course! Everybody knows that if Sadam were still in power there would be absolutely no mass killings in Iraq and Al-Qaeda had nothing to do with these bodies in the river, the football field, and the world Trade Center on 9/11. It's all a conspiracy by Bush and Harper that Martin and the Liberal Party are protecting us from.
|
Did I read that incorrectly, or do you think that Iraq was involved with Al Qaeda and the 9/11 attacks?
|
You just have to understand that when you write:
"I'm aginst the Iraq war, and am glad Canadian troops aren't over there fighting and dying",
Sammie reads it as:
" Saddam Hussien was an all-together fine chap who wouldn't hurt a soul, and Al Qaeda is simply a misunderstood group of cave enthusiasts who have been falsely accused" [he apparently makes the second conclusion based on the assumption that Saddam and Al Qaeda were working together, so a refusal to got after Saddam = a refusal to go after Al Qaeda]
It's another classic Sammie leap of logic that keeps his world brimming with straw men to slay with his rapier sharp wit.[/b][/quote]
Damn it! I never would have thought of that if you hadn't told me what I thought. You're GOOD!
Can you simplify what I was thinking when I came to the second conclusion because I haven't got a clue how I could have figured that part out all by myself? :unsure:
