Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5
That's already happening as well...or atleast is in the process.
The thing is you hear a lot of noise from Calgary about how it's emerging as a player on the world-stage. Well, if that is truly the case, it's time to start comparing yourselves to world-class cities....and frankly, when it comes to culture, aesthetics and a depth of culture, it's really behind. It needs to go beyond utilitarian, because some the flash is what sells to the rest of the world.
If Calgary wants to compare itself to Edmonton, then sure, the status quo is fine. But if you are going to want to compare yourself to places like Toronto or Vancouver...time to step up, gentleman.
|
I'm with T5 exctly here. What is Calgary's long term future after the oil/gas boom? Whats going to help keep businesses in Calgary when the markets move elsewhere? As stupid as it sounds investing $50M into 2 bridges, its part of the long term goal of installing the infrastructure that makes Calgary attractive for years to come. Without these aesthetically pleasing landmarks, Calgary is going to be a Uranium City - with these landmarks, Calgary starts to launch itself into a big player in the world.
Besides, Calgary just blew almost $10M on 1 year of Tanguay and Aucoin, whats $25M a bridge?
