View Single Post
Old 09-10-2008, 11:04 AM   #21
Cowboy89
Franchise Player
 
Cowboy89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
This city needs to focus a bit on aesthetics now instead of purely functionality.

Public structures and spaces are what makes a city great. People like Ric McIvor are the reason we have a huge courthouse downtown that looks like every other office building instead of the great building it could have been.
Quite frankly I'd take a better standard of living and quality of life over having a couple of pretty $25 million pedestrian bridges. Assumbing Calgary has close 200,000 property owners that's an average cost of $250 per property owner just for these two stinking pedetrian bridges assuming no cost inflation due to typical city hall incompetance. If they built a series of bridges and improved pathways for that cash (Which I figure they could do for that amount), it would do a much greater service to our people and city.

I agree that making things look pretty can sometimes be beneficial and help the aura of the city, but not on the scale of cost of this proposal.
Cowboy89 is offline   Reply With Quote