Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayems
Well, the camera man is in a bit of a quagmire. Firstly, he's just there doing his job. Just like a camera man at a Flames game. As such, he'll shoot where the action is. At the end of the day, it's not his say as to what goes to air or not. He just shoots what he sees. How can you really blame the camera guy?
Secondly, the other issue is that if he has a conscientious objection to shooting that and he doesn't, but CTV does, then he'll get his peepee slapped back at the newsroom for not getting the shots.
He's in a really tough spot.
Put all that, together with angry bystanders who will be the first to condemn cameramen for getting the shots, but unable to remove themselves from the peanut gallery — and still probably watch it on the news — and they're in a real tight spot.
It's remarkable how people can stand there and watch a fire, car accident or whatever for 20+ minutes, yet have the gall to call out a guy who's just doing his job and snaps a few photos or takes a few video shots.
Did i mention they're in a difficult situation?
|
I'll give you that, even as I wrote it, I realize that he's just doing what he's told, but he still received my scorn, my anger is directed more at Global itself, the editors and producers of the pieces.
but there is a differences between watching a fire, car accident or "whatever" for 20 minutes, and showing someone breaking down on television at the loss of their sun, it was extremely haunting and bush league, and ultimately extremely unprofessional. I didn't realize global had turned into TMZ.