Quote:
Originally Posted by evman150
This is not true at all. I have actually formulated very good defences of my position in several posts in this thread. There has yet to be a rebuttal to one of these defences that has not been a logical fallacy.
But of course it's much easier to just say "you're a ######bag", than to actually come up with an intelligent response to an intelligent argument.
|
From post #43
"This is so obvious to me I wonder how people think any differently.
It's because people tend to be blinded by their emotions and are unable to think critically when faced with things like child rapists. It's that same weak-mindedness and inability to think critically that manifests itself as the plague of organized religion, superstition and mass credulity."
and...
From post #50
"The truth can't be called arrogance." (the truth being your opinion)
From post #78
"As usual with your posts in threads like this, a candle in
the darkness that is this hatred-filled message board."
Nice melodramatic metaphor...wow.
From post #87
"It's so funny, nobody can rebut me without resorting to logical fallacies. Geez, I wonder if there's a correlation around here somewhere..."
Now you will throw out some BS about how I am trying to create distraction from your brilliant argument but can you honestly look at these quotes and tell me that you haven't disqualified arguments yet to be made against your own by questioning the intelligence of everyone that doesn't agree with you, the 'persona' of the messageboard itself and by declaring the supreme correctness of your own opinion?
For the record, I haven't rebutted you because I don't disagree wtih your final outcome. I disagree with how you get there and I vehmently disagree with the way you present it.