Quote:
Originally posted by Mean Mr. Mustard+Apr 3 2005, 08:05 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mean Mr. Mustard @ Apr 3 2005, 08:05 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-moon@Apr 3 2005, 12:24 PM
I don't understadn the need for an R rating anyways. If I want my kids to see the movie and feel they are up to it I should be able to bring them with me. I don't need someone telling me that I don't even have the option to bring them with me to see it.
|
Now that would work fine if all parents were responsible, and were good parents, however you must realize that there are a great number of parents who wouldn't think twice about what their children viewed, and the effects that the images had on the childern. In a large number of cases I would think that the parent doesn't even have second thoughts about the violence that their childern view, and that is a sad fact in my opinion. [/b][/quote]
But who are you (not blaming you, just using you as an example) to say that these effect kids, you know when Columbine happened everybody was just happy with blaming Video Games, TV and Marilyn Manson, did it ever occur to anyone that It might of been because the fact they were picked on at school and were ignored by their parents,
My Cousin's on different sides of the family were opposites, one was allowed to do whatever he pleased (watch any movie, stay out late ie. to most people being overexposed) while the other had to wait till the day he turned 18 to watch an 18A movie. Ones a 7-11 manager while the other is making 6-figures owning his own busnesses. And it's not the way that most people would assume, yes believe it or not folks someone who was allowed freely to do whatever he wanted didn't go out and kill people or wreck his life with a crappy job, but makes huge bucks doing what he wants to do Sadly people blaming overexposure for failure are using it as a cop out for crappy parenting.