What's crazy, and this has probably been said before, but what's really crazy is that by allowing DRM to effectively set its own limits, the government is allowing content providers to create their own laws.
If altering DRM is against the law, then anything that DRM does must then be within the law. But there's absolutely no law regulating DRM... so it has the power to keep people from exercising other legal rights granted by the bill.
Shouldn't we define and limit DRM before we pass a law protecting it?
|