06-17-2008, 04:00 PM
|
#122
|
Franchise Player
|
I just have to point out this complete contradiction within the same post, it’s stunning
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traditional_Ale
Did you even read my post? I'm not breaching anyone's rights. This is a debate about the fundamental definition of marriage which in my opinion is a heterosexual union. Like I said in my previous post, the homosexual community needs to come up with their own term. Think Coke and Pepsi, essentially the exact same product, but you cannot work for both at the same time.
Using the term "marriage" to describe a union is a heterosexual term.
If they're gay, then it would be the same word as I have been alluding to. Its not meant to be derogatory.
Its not different in any way, shape, or form except for the title of the institution (ie, not marriage, but something else).
Marriage is a heterosexual term.
No problem, and they will be treated completely equal in their union that is not titled as a "marriage."
But again I say, "marriage" is a heterosexual term. I know plenty of very gay people that feel the same too
For the last time, I am not suggesting homosexuals be treated differently.
|
Here is the thing you fail to grasp making them use there own term for marriage is treating them differently, it only separates them from the rest of society. When in most cases all they want to do is fit in with everyone else and not have and to labeled different because of who they choose to love
Marriage is not a heterosexual term it not a homosexual term either, it’s an expression of love and union, everyone should have the right to it
Last edited by J pold; 06-17-2008 at 04:07 PM.
|
|
|