Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Miikka?
I think a regular drink on its own costs $24.70. Haha but seriously, that sounds like decent value.
I'll give Shamalama that he's original and I agree with the thematic through-points as well; that holds up to the old film-school classic "auteur theory", which has to be worth something. And the fact that Ebert liked this new one bodes well, because he and I see eye-to-eye fairly consistently.
I still think the ending to the Village was a big slap in the face. And Shamalama needs to get over his Hitchcock complex and stop putting himself in every one of his movies.
|
I read that he is hard to see in this one. Is that conceit on his part do you think? Or is he just having some fun?
I must say, I liked Signs very much, but didn't enjoy his acting part in it.