Am I missing something here? So there's two choices, you can either be red or blue, and red won 55% of the time. Does this seem like a very uncompelling stat to anyone else? I don't brag that I win 55% of the time in NHL '08, because I'm losing 45% of the time.
The red team is winning just slightly more than they are losing. Also, wouldn't this "study" have more to do with which guys are blue and which are red? Wouldn't this study just show that there were a few better players wearing red than blue? I'm totally lost on this?....and I would like to be paid to do this kind of "research".
|