View Single Post
Old 06-09-2008, 02:17 PM   #73
MelBridgeman
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer View Post
The parents never requested that the flight have no traces of peanuts.
They requested the airline not walk around handing out peanuts to everyone.




That's a rather bizarre hypothetical. I suppose the answer to that is the same as above, the parents had no expectation that people who wanted (needed?) to bring peanuts aboard would be stopped.



Which is why the airline is at fault.

I would be with you if the airline said "we can't make that promise" - and the parents sued saying the airline had to accommodate. But that's just not the case.
At this point we don't know for sure if any employee guaranteed this. Anyways it also states that if they won they would be donate the money to there lobby group called FAAN.
The whole thing seems kinda fishy
What i mean by that is chances are when its all said in done, AA will ban peanuts from there flights, which is what i suspect the family and FAAN really want out of this.
MelBridgeman is offline   Reply With Quote