Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
Well allow me to Rebut....
1) Aliza Shvart's "art" was one of three examples given by the author though it was certainly the main one since at the time of the article's writing it was certainly headline news. As clearly written, "Or so she claimed; whether she actually did any of this remains unclear." the author doubted the authenticity. But whether her art authentic or not wasn't the point of the article.
Which goes to answer #2:
- Why would anyone who actually read this article and comprehended it talk about talk about "inflammatory posts" and "hoaxes". It is about the author's opinion about how art should be taught.
So....
#3 why focus on this hoax when the article is about a more traditional teaching method? Because the people either did NOT read the article or simple did not understand what the author was saying.
Finally, thanks for the psychoanalysing and the offhanded insult. A lot to do about an article on Art.
|
That was a reply to Iowa. See? Here is the whole reply?
Wow are you drunk?
I'm done here. I'm leaving it in the hands of the mods.