Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon
Dude, my first post. Stop playing games. That's already deeper in the thread.
|
I am not playing games. That was the first post I directly replied to YOU.
The one prior it was quite obvious you read the quote, though likely not all of the quote, and did not read the article at all.
If you did read the article then you obvious never comprehended it as you remarked on the hoax. Well that hoax wasn't what the article was about.
Her is the post to IFF which summarizes what I think about the posts prior to my second post on this thread.
1) Aliza Shvart's "art" was one of three examples given by the author though it was certainly the main one since at the time of the article's writing it was certainly headline news. As clearly written, "Or so she claimed; whether she actually did any of this remains unclear." the author doubted the authenticity.
But whether her art authentic or not wasn't the point of the article.
Which goes to answer #2:
- Why would anyone who actually read this article and comprehended it talk about "inflammatory posts" and "hoaxes". It is about the author's opinion about how art should be taught.
So....
#3 why focus on this hoax when the article is about a more traditional teaching method? Because the people either did NOT read the article or simple did not understand what the author was saying.
That said. I am not the one picking the fight. I wasn't the one firing of insults. I didn't call anyone a tool or a leftwingnut or any such thing. The only one that actually asked me what I was getting at was....you.
I have been DEFENDING MYSELF from condesending insults and fly-by flames. My second post was right on the money. No one who had commented on this thread had read the article until after I posted that. They all either stoped at the name (mine), the first sentence, or the first paragraph but they sure didn't go and read the article. That includes you.
Honestly....
It was an article I though was interesting. Thought I would share it with the board. Read it or move on to another thread. Agree with it or not.