Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
Hmm...didn't read the article either did we?
An article on how Art is taught is some how inflammatory? Yeeeaaa.  |
Sigh. As usual, you're intractable in your refusal to listen to what anyone else is saying. Let's review:
1. You posted an article that purports to diagnose a problem in how art is taught by reference to a shocking piece of performance art involving self-inflicted abortion. The article claims that this piece of art is exemplary of an "Immaturity, self-importance and a certain confused earnestness" that is apparently encouraged by Yale's pedagogical practices.
2. Other posters responded by saying that said piece of performance art was a hoax--making it exemplary of nothing. Since this was debunked months ago, your face should be red. So should the face of the professor who wrote the article, who like you suffers from a terminal complex of self-importance which led him to fall for the hoax created by the Yale student who wrote an op-ed piece about a piece of performance art that didn't exist.
3. You claim that those posters didn't read the article. This is, I've noticed, your fallback position--which is fine, I guess, if you don't like to debate stuff.
I hope it's clearer now--but I sense you're someone who has a hard time admitting fault, so I think the best thing is just to slink away and let this thread fall into obscurity along with your millions of others.