View Single Post
Old 03-29-2005, 10:40 PM   #9
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Mark Ferman messed up that case, they should have never let OJ put on the bloody glove.

That was an open and shut case, they had DNA, motive, everything they needed to get a conviction.

Now as for Cochran... It takes balls to be a criminal defense lawyer, they have a tough job, make a ton of cash and take a lot of flack.

But dispite that... I think with all that evidence Cocharn should have just walked away and had nothing to do with this case.. I'd hope more criminal lawyers (like Matlock), have some morals they can live their life by and accept cases.

I know that what I say is a very thin line... but seriously I bet Cocharn thinks OJ really was guilty and he just had to expose some red herrings to make him walk.
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote