Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Zoology. University of Chicago, 1961.
How many people honestly take Dr. Suzuki seriously anymore? There are many other much more reputable, actual climatologists and earth scientists who argue strenuously for man-made climate change.
|
Exactly my point. I'm not suggesting I don't believe or I do believe in climate change, or more specifically the extent to which man is responsible for said climate change. Just that listening to Suzuki prattle on about it has grown tiresome. He was just on CTV's "Question Period" on Sunday and introduced as "famed environmentalist Dr. Suzuki". I personally think if he is in fact a "famed environmentalist" they shouldn't use the "Dr." part of his title in relation as it is, in fact, not related and perhaps lends additional credence to his opinions.
If, for example, I told you about a growth I had but I had it checked by a doctor you'd probably assume I meant an actual medical physician and might be inclined to accept his position of "nothing to worry about". If you later learned that "doctor" was actually a PhD in Sociology or, god forbid, Chiropractic Medicine
, you might be right to think a second opinion by a "real" doctor would be appropriate.
Is Suzuki still postulating about having scientists (or any others) that question the nature and extent of man-made climate change jailed?