Quote:
Originally Posted by Flame On
Wouldn't you have to be a scientist in one of the fields in order to refute the legitimacey of their findings? Otherwise it seems that what you're saying is we should take heed of your doubts, over those who are studying in the field.
Also the angle that the scientists are doing this to get grants is far more "easier a way out" than anything elese.
|
Wow.
I wasn't refuting anything. I was simply stating that believing the conclusions by reading all the text at the link 89 provided would be foolish. Then went on to complain about the way the media 'releases' this information. I didn't ask anyone to heed my doubts. In fact, I didn't present any doubts. I presented questions....which anyone SHOULD do when reading a scientific study. I also didn't raise the angle of 'scientists doing this to get grants' I simply stated it as something that should be looked at in ANY scientific study.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|