I don't see how wrongdoing by Annan has anything to do with the UN's credibility as an organization.
If Cheney was caught in a compromising situation with his role as VP and his ties to Halliburton, would these mean that the US Government would be facing 'D-Day', and would there be questions about taking the whole thing apart as unworkable as a result?
Of course not. Cheney would be tarred and feathered, and a new VP would be selected.
I'm not sure how the actions of an individual or group of individuals somehow reflects poorly on the organization, rather than the administration.
I wonder who has more skeletons, Kofi Annan, or GW? Cheney? Martin? Chretien?
|